Detect anomalies andprevent losses with AI
Connect sales, payments and inventory to review voids, returns and discounts with the context behind each sale.
Loss prevention
Sale voided after payment
Check whether the payment was reversed and what happened to the item.
POS transaction
Void recorded
Payment record
Reversal to validate
Inventory movement
Stock exit to compare
Pending review
Gather evidence and assign an owner
One transaction. Different questions.
Operations
What happened in the store and which evidence is missing?
Loss prevention
Which signals need investigation and follow-up?
Finance and audit
Are payments, movements and decisions supported by evidence?
From scattered records to reviewable cases.
- 01
Connect the sources
Define stores, periods and the available sales, payment and inventory files.
- 02
Agree on controls
Set rules based on your policies and data quality. Each signal should explain its trigger.
- 03
Review the evidence
Link transactions and supporting records in a case. Assign an owner and document the review.
- 04
Close and learn
Record the conclusion and agreed actions. Refine controls with operational context.
Controls start with everyday operations.
Voids
Compare voided sales with payments and product movements. Review sequences, timing and evidence before reaching a conclusion.
Returns
Link returns to original sales, refunds and inventory receipts. Identify the evidence still missing.
Discounts
Compare discounts with your policies and approvals. Distinguish valid promotions from exceptions that need review.
Start with a focused scope.
Select a period and a group of stores. Together, we review the available sources, rules and evidence needed to evaluate the use case.
- Available sources and fields
- Business policies and exceptions
- Owners and closure criteria
Before you start
Does an alert mean fraud occurred?
No. An alert identifies a condition that needs review. A conclusion requires validating data, supporting records and operational context.
What data do we need?
This depends on the control. Common starting points include POS transactions with references and dates, payments, returns, discounts and inventory movements. Scope depends on the sources available.
Does this replace our POS or ERP?
The use case builds on records from your systems. Sources, formats and frequency are assessed when defining scope; integration with every provider is not assumed.
How does this relate to payment reconciliation?
Reconciliation helps identify differences between sales, payments and settlements. Loss prevention adds operational context, policies and signal review to document each case.
Let’s discuss your operational controls.
Bring your sources and your team’s questions. Let’s define an initial loss prevention scope together.